W-BASIC 3.23, The Last Official Release
Microsoft created GW-BASIC version 3.23 in 1987 and that was the
last official, commercial one. It is unsurprisingly unsupported, but
still under copyright so it can't be sold or distributed without
permission.
- gwbasic.exe.zip: GW-BASIC executable for DOS
- gw-man.zip: GW-BASIC manual; official documentation and full command reference
- gw-man.pdf: GW-BASIC User's Guide and Command Reference for Kindle and other e-readers
GW-BASIC Command Reference
Thomas Shaffner released
Microsoft GW-BASIC User's Guide and User's Reference to the web and you can easily find copies of it.
GW-BASIC on Windows 7
aka "Where do I download GW-BASIC for Windows 7, 8, 10 ... ?"
GW-BASIC was last released in 1988 as you can see from any
screenshot of its start screen. It's a 16-bit DOS executable that uses
processor instructions no longer supported in modern, 64-bit CPU's /
operating systems. Simply put:
GW-BASIC.EXE cannot run directly on Windows!
Don't lose hope, because this is where emulators come in.
DOSBox is
the premier DOS emulator with the best support and works on multiple
platforms. You'll just need a passing knowledge of DOS and how a
filesystem works, but otherwise running in an emulator is straight
forward, like running a virtual PC from ye olden times inside your fancy
new toy.
Carlos Vazquez
adds: The closest thing there is to a 64 bit gw basic is qb64 (a 64 bit
clone of quick basic) i havent tested if qb64 runs gwbasic programs
(quickbasic could run them and even save them in binary form) (www.qb64.net)
Frank Carrión from Loja-Ecuado adds: Long ago I found on the
Internet a recommendation to run older programs on 64-bit computers. So
far I've managed successfully. It is to copy the program folder directly
on your hard disk (C :), and from there run the file (.EXE)
application. In the case of GW-BASIC copied the application in C: and no
problems on my computer with Windows 8. From there you can create a
shortcut on the desktop progam, and it works very well.
Compiling GW-BASIC Programs
aka "How to convert gw-basic programs to exe extension?"
What you're talking about is
compiling the BAS file to an
executable.
There are three immediate and essentially free options:
- BASCOM is a program intended to compile BAS to EXE for BASICA,
IBM's version of BASIC for DOS and the precursor to GW-BASIC. It will
handle both the binary and ASCII format BAS files and supports pretty
much everything except EGA (certain SCREEN modes).
- QuickBASIC 4.5 is
the direct successor to GW-BASIC and can handle probably 95% of all
GW-BASIC programs with the exception of those that rely on more esoteric
features.
- FreeBASIC has little
development going on but it theoretically handles almost all QB programs
and so will handle GW-BASIC programs as well.
Backstory: I keep seeing this question, asked on Yahoo! Answers, come up in search results. It's two years too late and the question is set to
resolved, but I had to add some more information.
GW-BASIC 3.23, The Last Official Release
Microsoft created GW-BASIC version 3.23 in 1987 and that was the
last official, commercial one. It is unsurprisingly unsupported, but
still under copyright so it can't be sold or distributed without
permission.
- gwbasic.exe.zip: GW-BASIC executable for DOS
- gw-man.zip: GW-BASIC manual (official documentation)
- gw-man.pdf: GW-BASIC User's Guide and Reference for Kindle and other e-readers
QBASIC.EXE in OLDDOS.EXE
Microsoft OLDDOS.EXE contains QBasic (which can run most GW-BASIC programs saved as ASCII) and several other "old DOS" utilities.
This was mirrored from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/135315.
PC-BASIC 3.23
GW-BASIC for modern incarnations of Windows and Linux? Yes! Here is an email from the project's creator Rob.
Hi, I thought you might enjoy my newly released project PC-BASIC 3.23.
It's essentially an open source clone of the GW-BASIC 3.23
interpreter; since it's python-based, it runs on most OSes including
Windows and Linux.
It is largely feature complete (including sound, graphics, file I/O,
and loading and saving 'protected' programs) though still under active
development. Have fun!
SilverLight BASIC Interpreter
You can play with the work-in-progress version at http://www.addressof.com/basic/
For the most part, all keywords that are not machine language
specific should be working to one degree or another. All graphics modes
circa GW-BASIC should be working as well. You can drag/drop .BAS files
directly to the editing surface to ease getting something up and working
right away. All files are stored in your browser sand-box. Contact the
author, Cory Smith, directly by visiting http://addressof.com.
BASIC-80 Interpreter for Windows
- basic-80.zip:
This comes from the pleasant Steve Pagliarulo who has graciously given
me permission to attach a copy of this wonderful software he has
developed. If you have any comments or questions, you can email him at
s_pagliarulo AT hotmail.com.
I too share your fondness of GW-BASIC and its father BASIC-80. I got
my start on a TRS-80 with Microsoft's LEVEL II BASIC. In any case, I'd
like to share with you my BASIC-80 compatible interpreter that I
finished late last year. It's very close to GW-BASIC but without the
graphics commands. It can also load/run many GW-BASIC programs.
I've been fooling with the interpreter for about 10 years. I finally
finished it because when I moved to 64-bit Windows, the 16-bit GW-BASIC
.exe is no longer spported. The interpreter is about 20 thousand lines
of C++ code. It is portable for the most part. Some of the OS specific
APIs have to be changed for other platforms. For right now, I have it
working as a 32-bit .exe on Windows. I'm thinking of porting it next to
Raspberry pi.
I've attached a link to a zip file
with BASIC.EXE interpreter and a few sample programs including a chess
program writthn for GW-BASIC. Unlike GW-BASIC, this interpreter does not
have a full-screen editor. It uses the original editor from BASIC-80.
To edit a line you have to use the EDIT command.
GW-BASIC vs FreeBASIC
There are, I'm finding, significant differences between GW-BASIC and FreeBASIC.
For the first, you actually have to specify -lang deprecated in order
to even support line numbers. So the compatibility goal of FreeBASIC
being equivalent to QBasic is immediately suspect. What I'm looking for
is a compiler to create modern operating system executables (Windows
XP+, Ubuntu, OS X, etc.) with full support for GW-BASIC's language, or
even QB.
KEY OFF not supported, for obvious reasons. QB ignores
this command but FBC (FreeBASIC compiler) blows up with an error. If I
can't tell it to ignore certain statements then right away I have to
fork my code for a FBC version.
KEY (#) ON/OFF and
ON KEY (#) GOSUB not
supported. This is really annoying, but I already made changes to
support INKEY$ polling in QB so that will supposedly work in FBC.
DEF FNname() not supported. You can create full-blown
functions but not simple one-liners in the GW style. For me this is
another indication I'll have to fork. I don't think this would be
difficult for them to implement, perhaps I'll post it on their forum.
EXTERR() not supported. I'm not using this, but how hard would it be to support?
GOSUB # ... RETURN doesn't work unless you specify
"-lang qb". The line number support can be enabled with "-lang
deprecated" and yet if you try to call
RETURN it reports "Illegal outside blah blah blah or SUB block".
SCREEN() isn't supported. For this I don't mean the
routine to switch screen modes but rather the function that returns the
value at a location in the text screen buffer. It seems to think I'm
declaring a variable by this name.
Perhaps the FreeBASIC team would be interested in fixing these,
though probably not. Development appears to have slowed down and why
would support extend so far back? Still, I wish there was something I
could use without having to roll my own (which I'm considering).\
Aurthor-Dawood-aslam
Commands File-
Download
GW-Basic File-
Download
, type 
If you are prompted for an administrator password or for confirmation, type the password, or click Continue.
